Should citizens be allowed to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor but not control?
Self-hosted digital wallets are personal, user-managed storage solutions for digital currencies like Bitcoin, which provide individuals with control over their funds without relying on third-party institutions. Monitoring refers to the government having the capability to oversee transactions without the ability to directly control or interfere with the funds. Proponents argue that it ensures personal financial freedom and security while allowing the government to monitor for illegal activities such as money laundering and terrorism financing. Opponents argue that even monitoring infringes on privacy rights and that self-hosted wallets should remain completely private and free from government oversight.
Toggle voterbase
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Answer Overview
Response rates from 1.3k European Union voters.
Historical Support
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.3k European Union voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Historical Importance
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.3k European Union voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Other Popular Answers
Unique answers from European Union voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
Popular Conversations
Join in on the most popular conversations.
About This Data
Based on 1.3k responses to this question.
These results come from VOTA's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
VOTA is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Cite Or Embed This Poll
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.