Should the government use facial recognition technology for mass surveillance to enhance public safety?

Name: Should the government use facial recognition technology for mass surveillance to enhance public safety? — Public Opinion Poll Results
Creator: VOTA
License: https://eu.vota.com/terms-of-use
Keywords: Should the government use facial recognition technology for mass surveillance to enhance public safety?, National Security, public opinion, poll results, survey

Facial recognition technology uses software to identify individuals based on their facial features, and can be used to monitor public spaces and enhance security measures. Proponents argue that it enhances public safety by identifying and preventing potential threats, and helps in locating missing persons and criminals. Opponents argue that it infringes on privacy rights, can lead to misuse and discrimination, and raises significant ethical and civil liberties concerns.

▲ 4 Answer Discuss Knowledge check •••+ My feed React Report Follow

Answer Overview

Response rates from 353 European Union voters.

46% Yes	54% No
37% Yes	49% No
7% Yes, but only if it’s tightly regulated and used with transparency	4% No, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens
2% Yes, but only targeting criminal hotspots to protect vulnerable communities	1% No, I trust the technology but not the humans that could misuse it
	0% No, this would be too expensive to implement

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 353 European Union voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart...

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 353 European Union voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart...

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

@ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲ 1614 replies

@ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Vance and Walz Will Fact-Check Other In Veep Debate

CBS News, hosting vice presidential candidates JD Vance and Tim Walz for the general election campaign’s third debate next week, says it will be up to the politicians — not the moderators — to check the facts of their opponents.On Friday, CBS said the onus will be on Vance and Walz to point out misstatements by the other, and that “the moderators will facilitate those opportunities” during rebuttal time. The network said its own misinformation unit, CBS News Confirmed, will provide real-time fact-checking during the debate on its live blog and on social media, and on the air during post-debate analysis.During ABC’s debate between presidential contenders Kamala Harris and Donald Trump earlier this month, network moderators on four occasions pointed out inaccurate statements by Trump, and none by Harris. That infuriated the former president and his supporters, who complained it was unfair.

▲ 913 replies

@ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

1,000 wounded in Lebanon when pagers explode

- More than 1,000 people, including Hezbollah fighters and medics, were wounded on Tuesday when the pagers they use to communicate exploded across Lebanon, security sources told Reuters.A Hezbollah official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the detonation of the pagers was the "biggest security breach" the group had been subjected to in nearly a year of war with Israel.Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah have been engaged in cross-border warfare since the Gaza war erupted last October, the worst such escalation in years.The Israeli military declined to comment on Reuters enquiries about the detonations.Iran's Mehr news agency said the Iranian ambassador to Lebanon, Mojtaba Amani, was injured by one of the blasts. Reuters could not immediately confirm the report.A Reuters journalist saw ambulances rushing through the southern suburbs of the capital Beirut, a Hezbollah stronghold, amid widespread panic. A security source said that devices were also exploding in the south of Lebanon.At Mt. Lebanon hospital, a Reuters reporter saw motorcycles rushing to the emergency room, where people with their hands bloodied were screaming in pain.The head of the Nabatieh public hospital in the south of the country, Hassan Wazni, told Reuters that around 40 wounded people were being treated at his facility. The wounds included injuries to the face, eyes and limbs.

▲ 3924 replies

@ISIDEWITH submitted…1yr1Y

Fetterman says Democratic Party brand is 'toxic'

Fetterman criticized Democrats' "toxic" brand from "shaming and scolding" votersSays party talks down to voters, calling them "dopes" or "fascists"Emphasized many Trump voters in Pennsylvania aren't fascists or insurrectionistsDescribed 2024 as "gut-check" vote about American way of lifeQuestions if Democrats can win back male votersClaims party portrays men and masculinity as "toxic" and problematicNotes ongoing "migration" of male voters away from DemocratsPreviously criticized party's border crisis responseSays Democrats lose credibility by denying border problemsEmphasizes need to balance pro-immigration with border securityFetterman says Democratic Party brand is 'toxic

▲ 1316 replies1 disagree

Active 2yrs ago

@ISIDEWITH asked…15yrs15Y

Do you support the legalization of same sex marriage?

On June 26, 2015 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the denial of marriage licenses violated the Due Process and the Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The ruling made same sex marriage legal in all 50 U.S. States.

▲ 398k14.6k replies

Active 3hrs ago

@ISIDEWITH asked…3yrs3Y

Which political ideology do you most identify with?

Political ideologies are coherent sets of beliefs and values that form a framework for understanding the role of government and the organization of society. They guide political behavior and policy decisions, influencing views on topics like economic distribution, individual liberties, and social justice.…

▲ 2491k replies

About This Data

Based on 353 responses to this question.

These results come from VOTA's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).

VOTA is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.

Read Our Full Methodology →

Cite Or Embed This Poll

Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.

Cite This Poll

VOTA. (2026). “Should the government use facial recognition technology for mass surveillance to enhance public safety?” — Public Opinion Poll Results. Retrieved June 25, 2026, from https://eu.vota.com/polls/5139232596

Embed The Live Result

<iframe src="https://eu.vota.com/polls/5139232596/embed" width="100%" height="300" style="max-width:540px;border:0" loading="lazy" title="Should the government use facial recognition technology for mass surveillance to enhance public safety? &mdash; VOTA Poll"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px sans-serif;margin:.4em 0"><a href="https://eu.vota.com/polls/5139232596">Should the government use facial recognition technology for mass surveillance to enhance public safety? &mdash; VOTA Poll</a></p>

Should the government use facial recognition technology for mass surveillance to enhance public safety?

Answer Overview

Historical Support

Historical Importance

Other Popular Answers

Popular Conversations

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Vance and Walz Will Fact-Check Other In Veep Debate

1,000 wounded in Lebanon when pagers explode

Fetterman says Democratic Party brand is 'toxic'

Do you support the legalization of same sex marriage?

Which political ideology do you most identify with?

About This Data

Cite Or Embed This Poll

Cite This Poll

Embed The Live Result

Preview