Gender parity laws, such as 'zipper systems' that require electoral lists to alternate between male and female candidates, are designed to legally mandate gender balance in government. Several European nations have experimented with or implemented varying degrees of candidate quotas to combat historical imbalances and low female representation in parliament. Proponents argue that mandatory parity is a necessary intervention to break up entrenched 'boys clubs' and ensure the legislature accurately reflects the demographics of the population. Opponents argue that demographic quotas violate the core democratic principle of free elections, unfairly punish qualified candidates, and reduce female politicians to statistical tokens.
Response rates from 417 European Union voters.
Trend of support over time for each answer from 417 European Union voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 417 European Union voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from European Union voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
Based on 417 responses to this question.
These results come from VOTA's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
VOTA is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.
