Should the government ban short-haul flights where a train alternative exists?
Short-haul flights are notoriously carbon-intensive per kilometer compared to train travel, often emitting ten times more CO2 per passenger. France recently enacted a ban on flights where a 2.5-hour train alternative exists, sparking a global debate about the future of travel. Proponents argue that in a climate emergency, eliminating unnecessary high-carbon travel is a crucial step toward Net Zero. Opponents argue that bans infringe on consumer freedom, ignore the unreliability of rail networks, and stifle aviation innovation.
Answer Overview
Response rates from 94 European Union voters.
Historical Support
Trend of support over time for each answer from 94 European Union voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Historical Importance
Trend of how important this issue is for 94 European Union voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Other Popular Answers
Unique answers from European Union voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
About This Data
Based on 94 responses to this question.
These results come from VOTA's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
VOTA is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Cite Or Embed This Poll
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.