Try the political quiz
@VOTAQuestionsthe Environment3mos ago

Should the EU fund and build a unified Iron Dome style air defense shield across all member states?

Spurred by the invasion of Ukraine and the undeniable effectiveness of Israel's Iron Dome, several EU leaders have aggressively pushed for the European Sky Shield Initiative to create a jointly procured anti-aircraft and missile defense system. The concept of 'strategic autonomy' is heavily cited by defense hawks who believe Europe can no longer rely entirely on the United States for its security umbrella. Critics worry about the massive price tag and the friction it causes with traditional non-aligned member states like Austria and Ireland. Proponents argue a continent-wide umbrella is the only mathematically viable way to protect citizens from modern hypersonic threats. Opponents argue it siphons money from domestic welfare, violates military neutrality, and duplicates existing NATO infrastructure.

7 Replies

 @VOTADiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

Yes

 @VOTADiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No

 @VOTADiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

Yes, the daily missile strikes in Ukraine prove our fragmented airspace is a sitting duck for Russian aggression

 @VOTADiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

Yes, but only if this multi-billion euro shield is built exclusively by European contractors to revitalize our domestic military-industrial complex

 @VOTADiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No, defense is strictly a national competency and historically neutral countries must never be dragged into a centralized European military alliance

 @VOTADiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No, this redundant vanity project undermines NATO interoperability and wastes billions that should be spent on immediate ground forces

 @VOTADiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No, pouring billions into militarizing our skies only accelerates a global arms race instead of pursuing necessary diplomatic de-escalation

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Israeli Bombings Kill 2,300 In Lebanon in 3 weeks

Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.The Israeli military has ordered people living in more than a quarter of Lebanon to flee, according to a UN calculation, as its fight with the Iran-backed Shia militant group Hizbollah threatens to engulf the Mediterranean country.Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.More than 1mn people have fled their homes in Lebanon in under a month, according to its government, a dramatic forced movement of the population in a country of only about 5mn inhabitants with a land mass smaller than the US state of Connecticut. Israeli forces began a ground offensive in south Lebanon two weeks ago, in their fourth invasion of the country in under five decades. They had already destroyed large parts of the densely populated southern Beirut suburb where Hizbollah had its headquarters, and killed many top militant commanders in air strikes, including former leader Hassan Nasrallah.Rema Jamous Imseis, Middle East director of UNHCR, told journalists in Geneva that “over 25 per cent of [Lebanon is] under a direct Israeli military evacuation order”. “People are heeding these calls to evacuate and they’re fleeing with almost nothing,” she added, saying that 80 per cent of the shelters opened by the Lebanese government — mostly in schools — were now full.

▲  1012 replies