Should the government use economic stimulus to aid the country during times of recession?

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended unemployment compensation.

No for companies, yes for citizens.

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended time periods for citizens to receive unemployment benefits. ,

Yes, but only depending on how many people are in the household, and the current rate should be reduced.

Yes, and during the next large recession, the government should prioritize switching to the metric system

don;t know

Yes, and nationalize main industry, increase tariffs, and create public works to create jobs

Yes, in the form of tax breaks for everyone except those in the highest tax bracket

Government should lower the prices during recession.

Yes, but then cut during economic expansions

Yes, but in the form of stimulus checks to citizens; bailouts of industries encourages poor fiscal policies.

No using a Land Value Tax scheme would help to socialize land rents and aboud recessions instead

Yes, but in the form of monetary checks for citizens

Yes, direct assistance and possible tax breaks for low to lower middle income households. Direct and tax breaks for small business only.

Large companies and global corporations have the capital and should have the foresight to save and have their own safety net. The federal government need to adopt a hard policy of not providing fiscal support to large corporations, so it clear that those entities have to have their own contingency plan.

No, government stimulus is bad for the market and tax payer, especially when government causes said recessions and depressions i.e. the great depression and great recession. That was government failure and is just failed Keynesian economics that have only hurt people since Keynesian economics became the norm.

Yes, for small businesses

I honestly don’t know

Yes, but quantitative easements must stop as they endanger our economy more than they help it.

Yes, but primarily to lower wage citizens

The government should reduce certain spending during a recession, but should only be involved in the economy in times of a recession and only in the affected sectors and in the forms of lowering taxes, interest rates, and increase spending on infrastructure, but lay off of the economy in times of booms and only maintain competition between businesses

Yes, but 1) only at a locally combined rate at the Region/State/Metro area to the specifically affected companies and their employees, 2) to sectors that provide immediate jobs, training, and 3) a patr-time State/Federal volunteer program various public works projects (part-time to allow for re-education, earned income, and time off to look for new work or relocation).

Yes, but only in the form of direct payments to Americans

Yes, but in the form of providing employment opportunities (like the Civilian Conservation Corps).

No, but it should do it's best to help without using direct government power to do it. For example, they can have a competition to have the public crowdsource solutions.

Do a study on the efficiency and ethics and effects of each tax and apply accordingly.

Yes, by returning income taxes that where taken.

I don't have enough knowledge on this topic

Yes, for small businesses and people earning under $100k

Yes, but in the form of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession and extended unemployment benefits for workers

Yes, but in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment benefits for workers

No, except maybe for the poor.

Yes, but in the form of increased spending by federal agencies

Sometimes government intervention may be necessary, but only as a last resort

Yes, in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment benefits for workers

Yes, and reduce governmental spending

Yes, but individual's who are in need should apply for the stimulus. It shouldn't just be given to everyone.

Yes, by reducing spending, tax breaks for lower income citizens, and establish a Universal Basic Income

No, but allow tax breaks for median and low income citizens.

Do so with a permanent UBI.

Yes, in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment compensation for workers.

only if there is a great need, much like this pandemic. and the money should actually go to people in need unlike what happened with this pandemic

No, government stimulation is like steroids; It may help in the short term, but it will inevitably lead to problems later on due to, put simply, overexpansion. This is what caused the Great Depression, 2008, and nearly every other major recession.

Yes, but only if it is necessary

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended unemployment benefits

Yes, but only if the proposed bill is going to be used solely for economic recovery.

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for middle and low-income citizens, as well as reduction in government spending on unnecessary expenses.

Yes, when needed

Yes, in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment compensation.

Yes, but in the form of stimulus checks to all citizens

Yes, in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens, increased spending on infrastructure, and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession

That depends on circumstances of the recession.

Yes, in the forms of tax breaks for low income citizens, increased spending on infrastructure, and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession

Yes, and give tax breaks for all citizens

Yes, but in the forms of tax breaks for low income citizens and increased spending on infrastructure

Yes But Temporally for 4 months only.

Yes But Temporally for 4 months or less only.

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for middle-income and low-income citizens and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession

Yes, by using tax breaks for middle and low-income citizens, as well as reduction in spending on unnecessary expenses.

No, unless it is in the form of tax breaks for all citizens

Yes, but only to a certain degree.

Yes, but: 1.) in the form of tax breaks for all citizens 2.) in the form of assisting sectors most heavily hit by recession

Yes, but in the form of: - tax breaks for all citizens - assisting sectors most heavily hit by recession

Yes, but in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment compensation

yes but they have to be careful their not giving it to those who are already financial stable

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for middle- and low-income citizens and assisting sectors most heavily hit by recession, as well as reduced government spending

Yes, by using tax breaks for middle and low-income citizens, as well as reduction in government spending on unnecessary expenses.

Yes by only sending stimulus payments to US citizens

No, unless in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens

Yes, but it should be restricted and for a small amount of money.

Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment benefits for both middle income and low income citizens

Yes, but only by a) emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and b) reducing spending on unnecessary expenses in order to stabilize our economy. The government should only prioritize on those most affected by the recession, not those that caused it; it should also not make citizens reliant on the government once the recession is over.

Yes, but only by 1) emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and 2) reduce spending on unnecessary expenses. The government should only prioritize citizens who were most affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but only by 1) emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and 2) reduce spending on unnecessary expenses. The government should only focus on helping citizens who were most affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure until the markets have stabilized; measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. It should be used to help restart the economy; and once the recession is over, the government should curtail excess spending in order to reduce national debt.
However, the government should focus only by helping citizens most affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure until the markets have stabilized; measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. It should be used to help restart the economy; and once the recession is over, the government should curtail excess spending in order to reduce national debt.
However, the government should only focus on helping citizens most affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, in the forms of extended unemployment compensation and increased spending on infrastructure

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure to stabilize markets; measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. Once the recession is over, the government should curtail excess spending in order to reduce national debt. However, the government should only focus on helping citizens most affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure to stabilize markets. Once the recession is over, the government should curtail excess spending in order to reduce national debt. However, the government should only focus on helping citizens most affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens, and as a temporary measures to stabilize markets; measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. The government should focus on helping citizens mostly affected by the recession instead of those that caused it.

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure to stabilize markets. Measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. However, the government should instead focus on helping citizens mostly affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure to stabilize markets. Measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. However, the government should only focus on helping citizens mostly affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, quarterly stimulus checks for low-and-middle income citizens, and extended unemployment compensation benefits

Yes, in the forms of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, quarterly economic stimulus checks for low-and-middle-income citizens, and an extended period of unemployment compensation

Yes, in the forms of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, economic stimulus checks for low-and-middle-income citizens, and an extended period of unemployment compensation

Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and unemployment benefits as well as lowering interest rates

Yes, but discourage people from living solely on benefits.

Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended unemployment compensation benefits for low and middle-income citizens

Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for citizens

Only one is needed

No, but the government should provide tax breaks for all citizens

Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and an extended period of unemployment compensation for all eligible citizens

Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for low and middle-income citizens

Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment compensation for low and middle-income citizens

Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and tax breaks for low income citizens

No, and the government should drastically reduce spending.

Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits

Yes but only for individuals of low income that make less than 40 thousand a year.

Yes, in the forms of tax breaks for low income citizens and increased spending on infrastructure

Continue to provide welfare for those who need it, and only provide economic stimulus in ways that will ultimately not increase our national debt.