Should France continue to assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries?

Not at the fast past se if they are guilty or not

yes, if the terrorist is wanted dead or alive in that country.

I trust the judgment of the United States Military men and women to do what must be done to protect the freedoms that our constitution provides.

We shouldn't interfere in other countries' business.

Yes, if there is undeniable evidence that they have committed or are planning to commit an attack against our country.

i would say yes but it depends if what the do for example like drug car telling i would say yes for but just verbal assault no need to do it then

No, I think that they should be captured and interrogated. I do not think that you should take someone's life without an overwhelming amount of evidence that they are planning a terrorist attack.

If Congress declares war all enemy combatants are valid targets.

no, we cant kill someone for something they may never do

no, but ask questions

It depends on the situation but yes because for example like 9/11 they should of killed the nine men to save the thousands of people that died but I also think that if you can just capture them put them on trial and imprison them until they aren’t gulity.

Let their home country deal with it

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are a threat to the world; global threat.

They should not be assassinated without undeniable evidence that they did attack our country. However, if there is evidence that indicates the suspects are planning an attack, then they should be given a fair trial with due process.

No. They should be imprisoned if there is undeniable evidence that they are planning to attack our country.

Yes, but there need to be clear guidelines for verifying guilt. We cannot make mistakes.

Yes, if there is undeniable evidence that they are planning an attack on our country or undniaable evidence that they committed.

No because they may not be a terrorist and they would be assassinating an innocent person that might have a family. If they are a terrorist and the government has proof then yes they should.

If there is undeniable evidence that they're planning an attack or have already attacked our country, then yes. However, we should take them as prisoners as much as possible and give them a fair trial.

Yes but only if there's blatant evidence and the country we're entering gives it's approval

No, unless there’s undeniable evidence saying otherwise

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country or they have already committed an attack against our country.

No, it is not our business if it's in another country.

No, because they are in different countries and they shouldn't go to their country and try to rule them

Yes, only if they know he is a terrorist

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country, and No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

Only if they kniw that they have been responsible for attacks

No, take them in fr questioning and give them a air trial. If found not guilty repay them for the inconvenience and hardship.

Only if they just committed a punishable crime in the us recently

Only if they are confirmed to be terrorists.

No, only if it is confirmed that the person is a terrorist.

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence that they have either attacked or are planning to attack our country.

No, and they should only be apprehended if there is evidence they have committed an act of terrorism against our country and then given a fair trial

If our Military is fighting in that country then yes, but NOT if we had no reason to be there prior to.

Yes if they are absolutely and terrorist

Depends. This is a case by case basis.

No, the US should alert the country in which the terrorist is residing and give them the proper evidence showing they are planning or have committed an attack.

only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country.

only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

Yes, execute authority should be given if we know they´re dangerous.

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they plan to attack not just our country, but any country in general.

Not unless they pose a real threat

Only as a complete last resort. Capturing, interrogating and imprisoning is a better course of action to prevent potential further conflict.

If suspected then gather information first but then put them in prison don't kill them.

Yes, but with oversight with the foreign country if at all possible.

Yes, but only if they have been identified and confirmed in an attack against U.S. or our allies, or are confirmed in activities that violate internationally agreed upon human rights

No, don't for-say plan an assassination, just if they have attacked or plan to and we have undeniable evidence, we should take them in, question them, and kill them by a death penalty, there is no reason to risk soldiers lives to assassinate someone.

If there is any rockhard evidence to support the idea of the suspects being terrorists, assasination and/or total oblitaration should be allowed.

No, the U.S. should get approval and assistance from the foreign country in question to capture and give them a fair trial.

Yes but only only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country or if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed or plan on committing an attack against our country.

you should get proof

Only if it a true enemy to the United States and U.S civilians are in danger.

They have to have eve dance

Depends on what crimes they’ve committed

Yes, but only if they attack our country or are planning to with undeniable evidence

Yes, but only with the authorization of Congress and (even last second) notice given to the United Nations of targets.

yes, but only if we can't catch them and only if we hurt citizens

it is not the job of the us to deal with terrorism problems in other countrys

To Each Countrys and Community There Own War Rules

Yes, if only we have enough evidence and speculation they are planning a attack.

They should be proven first.

They should not be able to assassinate people but they should be able to put them under arrest and prosecute them.

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country or one of our close allies

Maybe because if the Goverment knows that they are going to try to hurt people in their country.

Yes if they have caused or are planning on attacking. I believe they should be interrogated first don't risk any other human life right away just because of suspicion.

If there is undeniable evidence we should interrogate them and then imprison them if they truly are a terrorist.

Yes, but we should first capture and interrogate.

Yes, but only if there is evidence they are planning a attack and/or have committed a attack on our country

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country and/or planning to attack our country.

Yes, but only when gathered intelligence shows undeniable evidence which confirms (not suspects) that terrorists are planning to attack our country

Yes, but only if they are guilty of acts against the United States and do not risk hurting civilians in the assassination attempt.

I think so because it could save lifes

Only if they have attacked or are planning an attack on our country.

No, we should only arrest foreign terrorists if they enter a territory occupied by our government (i.e. the 50 states & island territories).

Only for those who have or were about to attack our nation.

There's no way of knowing if they actually are if they're only suspected, it should only be allowed when it is definitive.

Yes, but only when gathered intelligence shows undeniable evidence that confirms (not just suspects) terrorists are planning to attack our country

No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead if there is undeniable evidence

Depends on the situation. If it is a terrorist whom has been leading attacks and killing for a long period of time and never being able to be caught due to possibly, say, a high standing in home country, than yes.,

No, the government has absolutely no right to intervene in foreign conflicts.

Yes, if they have or are planning an attack on us.

If they have or are planning an attack on our country.

Yes, only with the cooperation and support of said country.

yes, but only if it is too dangerous to capture and "interrogate" them.

Yes, but only when gathered intelligence shows undeniable evidence that confirms (not only suspects) terrorists are planning to attack our country

Only if they have or are actively planning an attack on us.

NO! I do not agree with killing people no mater what they have done! I believe they should use them to catch other terrorists and get information out of them and then either send send them back or imprison them but NOT KILL A PERSON!!! EVEN THOUGH THEY DO IT ANYWAYS!!!

Yes, but only if they are confirmed (not just suspected) terrorists and there is undeniable evidence they have planned an imminent attack against our country

Yes, but only if they are confirmed terrorists and there is undeniable evidence they have planned an imminent attack against our country

Yes, but only if they are confirmed terrorists and there is undeniable evidence they have planned an imminent attack against our country.

Yes, but only if they’re a threat to multiple countries.

Not assassinate but if there is evidence then yes

Yes, but only if they have or are planning on attacking the United States.

i really do not know but i am leaning to no

Yes; only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country or only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

We need to stop being the world’s police.

if their is evidence and no other choice.

No in theory, but if capturing them safely puts people at risk, then assassination attempts should be valid.